K\u00e6re Alexa Peters <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Du har stillet mig et sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l; Hvorfor skal den terti\u00e6re sektor have \u00e9t barn i mit system opl\u00e6g?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Som jeg allerede har fortalt dig, fort\u00e6ller erfaringen os at det er den befolkningsgruppe som bedst kan undv\u00e6res som bliver udslettet, hvis jordens b\u00e6reevne falder drastisk, er det altid den terti\u00e6re sektor som bliver udslettet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jeg vedl\u00e6gger en kopi af mit brev til en kammerat fra Hamburg.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kopi:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Hallo Claus, <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ich verstehe deinen Frust \u00fcber die Situation in Deutschland, aber ich schreibe immer noch Artikel, die auf meinen Erfahrungen basieren. Ich sende Ihnen einen Artikel und hoffe, dass wir unseren Dialog fortsetzen k\u00f6nnen. Ich w\u00fcrde vorschlagen, dass Sie damit hier aufh\u00f6ren, da ich diese Artikel bereits auf meiner eigenen Website ver\u00f6ffentliche. Dies ist ein Google-\u00dcbersetzer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gr\u00fc\u00dfe<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jens<\/p>\n\n\n\n
4<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The headline symbolizes the number four which according to Chinese tradition should preferably be avoided as it can give poverty to a family.
According to my information, China introduced System 2 1 1 some years ago. In my view, this presents a dilemma for the individual family. If the family in question lives in an urban zone, the family has a choice between losing face or gaining a reputation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The wage of working in the secondary sector has traditionally always been lower compared to the tertiary sector, if I transfer this to Chinese conditions, the individual family who has the choice between working the secondary sector \u2013 with the right to a child and a lower wage. Or working in the tertiary sector with the right to a child and a higher wage, it will be obvious to most that if a family has the option of a higher wage also involve reputation for the family as it can avoid what the number four expresses \u2013 poverty. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plato has described the duality in the Cave, this is expressed in the Danish population who have the view that the tertiary sector is the most important for Denmark. It is the other way around. The tertiary sector is most important to women because it gives them access to the labor market.
I have been accused that my System 3 2 1 is to the detriment of Denmark,I can observe that after a full stop of my research, this stop has obviously been to even greater detriment to Denmark, with this we have an aftermath of duality \u2013 Of harm one becomes wise. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
To address the duality of our education system and to give our children a decent future. That the tertiary sector is wiped out by 100% If, for the sake of our descendants and their approach to the necessary resources, we embark on an educational reform that informs the population about the risk of a disproportionately large proportion of the population being unproductive, we may be able to get a family to choose to work in the primary \/ secondary sector in order to secure itself as best as possible against future social unrest, and that it becomes a tacit agreement in our society that even if a family has a high income in the tertiary sector, it can have one child without loss of face.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is a preliminary draft that can be changed as a result of constructive criticism. I have sent a copy of this article to the Chinese Embassy in Denmark on 26 \/ 3-2022.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sp\u00f8rg endelig hvis du har nogen sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l til mig, det kan v\u00e6re at det tager lidt tid f\u00f8r jeg svarer:)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Venlig hilsen<\/p>\n\n\n\n Jens<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" K\u00e6re Alexa Peters Du har stillet mig et sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l; Hvorfor skal den terti\u00e6re sektor have \u00e9t barn i mit system opl\u00e6g? Som jeg allerede har fortalt dig, fort\u00e6ller erfaringen os at det er den befolkningsgruppe som bedst kan undv\u00e6res som bliver udslettet, hvis jordens b\u00e6reevne falder drastisk, er det altid den terti\u00e6re sektor som bliver… L\u00e6s mere Dear American women<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":189,"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188\/revisions\/189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tifca.dk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
In periculo tuo<\/strong>
Two children one family
Introducing the two-child system, while providing our descendants with in-depth information on the consequences of an armed conflict at a general level as the battle for the remaining resources intensifies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That the secondary sector will be wiped out by approx. 50%
That the primary sector remains untouched<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jens Frank Illemann<\/p>\n\n\n\n