The headline symbolizes the number four which according to Chinese tradition should preferably be avoided as it can give poverty to a family.
According to my information, China introduced System 2 1 1 some years ago. In my view, this presents a dilemma for the individual family. If the family in question lives in an urban zone, the family has a choice between losing face or gaining a reputation.
The wage of working in the secondary sector has traditionally always been lower compared to the tertiary sector, if I transfer this to Chinese conditions, the individual family who has the choice between working the secondary sector – with the right to a child and a lower wage. Or working in the tertiary sector with the right to a child and a higher wage, it will be obvious to most that if a family has the option of a higher wage also involve reputation for the family as it can avoid what the number four expresses – poverty.
Plato has described the duality in the Cave, this is expressed in the Danish population who have the view that the tertiary sector is the most important for Denmark. It is the other way around. The tertiary sector is most important to women because it gives them access to the labor market.
I have been accused that my System 3 2 1 is to the detriment of Denmark,I can observe that after a full stop of my research, this stop has obviously been to even greater detriment to Denmark, with this we have an aftermath of duality – Of harm one becomes wise.
To address the duality of our education system and to give our children a decent future.
In periculo tuo
Two children one family
Introducing the two-child system, while providing our descendants with in-depth information on the consequences of an armed conflict at a general level as the battle for the remaining resources intensifies.
That the tertiary sector is wiped out by 100%
That the secondary sector will be wiped out by approx. 50%
That the primary sector remains untouched
If, for the sake of our descendants and their approach to the necessary resources, we embark on an educational reform that informs the population about the risk of a disproportionately large proportion of the population being unproductive, we may be able to get a family to choose to work in the primary / secondary sector in order to secure itself as best as possible against future social unrest, and that it becomes a tacit agreement in our society that even if a family has a high income in the tertiary sector, it can have one child without loss of face.
This is a preliminary draft that can be changed as a result of constructive criticism.
Jens Frank Illemann
I have sent a copy of this article to the Chinese Embassy in Denmark on 26 / 3-2022.